McGinn v. Willey
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mariposa County and from an order refusing a new trial. J. J. Trabucco, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
We can perceive no valid objection to the sufficiency of the complaint in this action for the specific performance of an agreement to sell one-sixth interest in a certain mine in Mariposa County. The terms of the contract are set out, the tender of the balance due and a demand for a deed and defendant’s refusal to comply with the demand appear and it is further alleged: “That the said agreement of purchase and sale between plaintiff and defendant was in every respect fair and equitable and no advantage of any kind was taken of defendant and the said consideration so to be paid was a fair…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Worrall v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Piercy v. SabinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Coles v. SoulsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Heinlen v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Peek v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roundy v. WanerIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Ah Pah Redwood Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
- Chatterton v. LukerIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
- Colley v. Chowchilla National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Hanley v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.