Legal Opinion
Hanley v. Murphy
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 8, 1924No. Docket No. 2780PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This action was/ brought by plaintiff to recover from defendant the sum of $1,660, alleged to be the' balance of the sum of $1,750 due plaintiff for labor performed by him for defendant.
The complaint alleges that, on the fifteenth day of April, 1920, in Modoc County, this state, defendant employed plaintiff to perform labor for the former in herding, looking after and caring for a large band of sheep belonging to defendant, upon an agreement that defendant would pay plaintiff for the labor so performed, wages or compensation at the rate of $100 per month; that plaintiff, in pursuance of said…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Martin v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Piercy v. SabinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Bliss v. SneathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Coles v. SoulsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Melander v. Western National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fergus v. SongerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- George v. Double-D Foods, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Ira Garson Realty Co. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Offeman v. Robertson-Cole Studios, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Miller v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.