Peek v. Peek
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court' of San Bernardino County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
Ejectment, with a cross-complaint by defendant praying for a conveyance of the legal’title. The facts are as follows: —
One L. R. Peek orally promised the defendant that if she would marry him he would, on or before the marriage, convey to her the property in controversy. She relied upon this promise, and married him “for no other reason or consideration.” The conveyance was not made. He put it off by excuses and protestations, and on the morning of the marriage, without the knowledge of defendant, conveyed, the property to his son by a former marriage, who was then a boy about ten…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Neale v. NealesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Lloyd v. FultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Green v. GreenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Petty v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1843
3Cited by24 opinions
- Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Merchants' National Bank v. GreenhoodMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- Daily ex rel. Daily v. MinnickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Trout v. OgilvieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- McConnell v. Bible InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.