Legal Opinion

Tadin v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1953PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

It is contended by appellants that the circuit court was without jurisdiction to vacate the commission’s award, that its power is limited by the provisions of sec. 102.24 (1), Stats.:

“(1) Upon the setting aside of any order or award the court may recommit the controversy and remand the record in the case to the commission, for further hearing or proceedings; or it may enter the proper judgment upon the findings, as the nature of the case shall demand. . . .”

The contention must be sustained. In Albion v. Industrial Comm. (1930), 202 Wis. 15, 231 N. W. 249, after the circuit court had entered a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Booth Fisheries Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Town of Albion v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Wisconsin Mutual Liability Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Kaegi v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Schaefer & Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gallenberg v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Worsch v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hopp v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API