Town of Albion v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
Sec. 102.23, Stats., provides that the findings of the commission cannot be set aside by the court unless one of the following grounds exists: (1) The commission acted without power. (2) The award was procured by fraud. (3) The findings of fact do not support the award. There is here no claim of want of power of the commission to entertain the claim or of fraud in procuring the award. We are only concerned whether the commission’s findings support the award.
In considering this question we are faced with the express provision of sec. 102.23 that findings of fact made by the commission are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Devine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- City of Milwaukee v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Luyk v. HertelMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Booth Fisheries Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Kudla v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rathjen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Gallenberg v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Continental Casualty Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Indrebo v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Kaegi v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.