Schaefer & Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The situation in each of these cases is this: The plaintiffs began an action to have an award of the Industrial Commission set aside. The judgments entered set aside the award made by the Industrial Commission in each case, which is in accordance with the prayer of the plaintiffs’ complaint. Of this they cannot complain, because they are not aggrieved thereby. They argue here that they are aggrieved because the judgment remands the record to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings.
Sec. 102.24 (1), Stats., provides in part:
“Upon the setting aside of any order or award the court may…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Green Bay Drop Forge Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Gallenberg v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Montreal Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Tadin v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.