Legal Opinion

Worsch v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1970No. 184PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnoe T. Hansen, J.

Appellant was employed by the defendant-respondent, Seymour Flour Mill, from July 3,1942, until December 31,1963, when he was forced to terminate his employment because of emphysema, at the age of forty-nine. Appellant filed a claim for workmen’s compensation on the grounds .the emphysema was an industrial disease caused by and related to his employment at the mill. On May 4, 1966, a hearing was held before an examiner, after which the following findings of fact were made:

“. . . that he had considerable exposure to dust and fumes while mixing and grinding feed; that the applicant sustained…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Braun v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Burton v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Thomson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Swiss Colony, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Xcel Energy Services, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Mednicoff v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Xcel Energy Services, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API