Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank v. Mayor of Baltimore
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 25, 1939No. 27PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
In this non-jury law suit the First National Bank of Binghamton, New York, is suing Baltimore City to recover the principal payable May 1, 1933 upon two certificates of so-called Baltimore City *447“Stock”, each for the sum of $5,000, with unpaid interest thereon from November 1, 1926. Although currently called “stock” the certificates are really promissory notes under seal. Both were issued October 6, 1925, and recited indebtedness to L. F. Rothschild & Co. Each of the certificates contains on the back a printed simple form of assignment which at the bottom bears the…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- National Safe Deposit, Sav. & Trust Co. of DC v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Bank v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Knill v. KnillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Jurgensen v. New Phoenix Atlantic Condominium Council of Unit OwnersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Maryland Cooperative Milk Producers, Inc. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Cunninghame v. CunninghameCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- United States v. GilmanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.