Legal Opinion
United States v. Gilman
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 26, 1973No. Civ. 71-982PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERBERT F. MURRAY, District Judge.
This civil action is brought by the United States of America for the use, benefit and credit of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, acting by and through the Assistant Secretary-Commissioner under the provisions of the National Housing Act, as amended. [12 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq.]. Defendants, Messrs. Gilman, Rosen and Gozan, were investor-developers involved in the construction of a 16-story apartment building in the City of Baltimore, Maryland, known as Sutton Place. For various reasons, the financial posture of the Sutton Place Project, whose…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Wallace G. Frederick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation v. Howard B. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Vincent v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- Castiglione v. Johns Hopkins HospitalCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Safer v. PerperCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Gregory Park, Section II, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
- Silver Air v. Aeronautic Development Corp. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.