Legal Opinion

Hopper v. Daniel

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 7, 2001No. CA 00-464PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN F. STROUD, Jr., Chief Judge.

This appeal involves a quiet-tide action, with an alternative prayer for partition, that was brought by appellants John Henry Hopper and his wife Betty J. Hopper. John Hopper is a grandson of Augustus and Martha Hopper, who acquired tide to a combined total of 120 acres in Yell County, the property in question, in the 1800s. Appellant Hopper’s father, Lawrence, was one of seven children born to Augustus and Martha. In his action, appellant John Hopper contended that his father had adversely possessed the property from the time of Martha’s death in 1947 until…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ueltzen v. RoeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  2. Mitchell v. HammonsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Wood v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Morgan v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trice v. TriceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Garland Trice Jr. v. Eoies Trice and Ocie TriceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
  3. Heirs at Law of Butler v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API