Legal Opinion

Ueltzen v. Roe

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 27, 1967No. 5-4121PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Bbown, Justice.

This is a suit to quiet title "brought by plaintiffs-appellees, Billy Roe and Neva Roe Sowl, brother and sister. They brought suit against the six brothers and sisters of their mother, Maude Roe. Basing his findings on adverse possession, estoppel, and laches, the trial court vested title in appellees. Appellants contend, first, that the Roe family failed to establish hostile possession, and, second, that no notice of adverse claim was ever brought home to appellants..

Here is the opinion of the trial court. It sets out the issues with clarity and of course states the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. KapplerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. McGuire v. WallisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  3. Staggs v. StorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Jones v. MorganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  5. Baxter v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Robertson v. LeesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Bowlin v. KeiferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Mitchell v. HammonsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Jaramillo v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Wood v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API