Legal Opinion

Trice v. Trice

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 15, 2005No. CA 04-405PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Larry D. Vaught, Judge.

Garland Trice, Ethel Green, Mattie Mason, and Margaret Dorsey (appellants) filed a petition to partition 171 acres in Moro, Arkansas. In response to the petition, Trenton Trice counterclaimed to be declared the sole owner of the property based on adverse possession and his exclusive possession of the property. After a hearing on the matter, the trial court concluded that Trenton held the land in question adversely to appellants and “that the title is in dispute. As a result, partition can not (sic) be granted.” On appeal, appellants argue that the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Koonce v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Odaware v. Robertson Aerial-AG, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Stoltz v. FridaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. White River Levee District v. ReidharCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Dillard v. PicklerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Sutton v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  3. South Flag Lake, Inc. v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  4. In the Matter of the Estate of Robert H. Slaughter, Deceased; Garland Trice, Jr. V.eoies Trice and Ocie TriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021
  5. Daniel v. CITY OF ASHDOWNCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API