Legal Opinion

People v. Trujillo

California Court of Appeal, 4th District

Decided January 4, 2016No. D069275PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcINTYRE, J.

*108The People appeal the order sustaining a demurrer to the felony complaint in this action, which contended (as relevant here), the *109complaint failed to provide sufficient notice of its charges in violation of Penal Code sections 950 and 952. (All undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.) The People maintain they met applicable pleading requirements. We agree and reverse the order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

According to the People, Defendants Sabas Trujillo, Lucia Trujillo, Richard (Rick) Trujillo, Laura Fitzpatrick, and Alex Trujillo (collectively Defendants), own or are…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. KempCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Wright v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Drayton v. DraytonSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
  2. Lorenzen v. LorenzenNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Montoya v. Sasso (In re Sasso)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API