Harrell v. J. P. Stevens & Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The duties of the Industrial Commission, when deciding a claim under G.S. § 97-53(13), have been recently enunciated by our Supreme Court in Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co., 297 N.C. 636, 256 S.E. 2d 692 (1979). Speaking through Chief Justice Sharp, the Court said:
Whether a given illness falls within the general difinition [sic] set out in G.S. 97-53(13) presents a mixed question of fact and law. The Commission must determine first the nature of the disease from which the plaintiff is suffering — that is, its characteristics, symptoms and manifestations. Ordinarily, such findings…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Morgan v. Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Cannady v. Gold KistCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- West v. StevensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by50 opinions
- Peagler v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Lineback v. Wake County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Bryant v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Jordan v. Central Piedmont Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Hassell v. Onslow County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.