Legal Opinion

Harrell v. J. P. Stevens & Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 1980No. 7910IC539PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The duties of the Industrial Commission, when deciding a claim under G.S. § 97-53(13), have been recently enunciated by our Supreme Court in Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co., 297 N.C. 636, 256 S.E. 2d 692 (1979). Speaking through Chief Justice Sharp, the Court said:

Whether a given illness falls within the general difinition [sic] set out in G.S. 97-53(13) presents a mixed question of fact and law. The Commission must determine first the nature of the disease from which the plaintiff is suffering — that is, its characteristics, symptoms and manifestations. Ordinarily, such findings…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Morgan v. Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Cannady v. Gold KistCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. West v. StevensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Peagler v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Lineback v. Wake County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Bryant v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Jordan v. Central Piedmont Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Hassell v. Onslow County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API