Legal Opinion

West v. Stevens

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1969No. 6918IC440PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeocK, J.

Plaintiff assigns as error Findings of Fact No. 5 and No. 7, and the conclusion based thereon that plaintiff is entitled to an award on the basis of a 12.5 percent permanent partial disability. Plaintiff argues that the only testimony before the Commission was that of Dr. John A. Lusk, and that his testimony supports only a finding of a 25 or 30 percent disability. Dr. Lusk testified that in his opinion “[h]er disability is about 25 to 30 percent of the left leg.”

Dr. Lusk also testified as follows:

“The thrombo-phlebitis found in both legs and the embolus in one of her lungs could have been…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harrell v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Harris v. FRANK L. BLUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. McNinch v. Henredon Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Bennett v. Progressive Furniture CompanyNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002
  5. Crowder v. Preston Trucking Co.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API