West v. Stevens
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeocK, J.
Plaintiff assigns as error Findings of Fact No. 5 and No. 7, and the conclusion based thereon that plaintiff is entitled to an award on the basis of a 12.5 percent permanent partial disability. Plaintiff argues that the only testimony before the Commission was that of Dr. John A. Lusk, and that his testimony supports only a finding of a 25 or 30 percent disability. Dr. Lusk testified that in his opinion “[h]er disability is about 25 to 30 percent of the left leg.”
Dr. Lusk also testified as follows:
“The thrombo-phlebitis found in both legs and the embolus in one of her lungs could have been…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Harrell v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Harris v. FRANK L. BLUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- McNinch v. Henredon Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Bennett v. Progressive Furniture CompanyNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002
- Crowder v. Preston Trucking Co.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.