Legal Opinion
Crawford v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided May 26, 2004No. 13-03-293-CRPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
On Motions to Proceed Pro Se
2Per curiam
Appellant Donald Ray Crawford, Jr. has filed a motion to proceed pro se on appeal as well as a second motion reiterating his desire to represent himself. His court-appointed appellate attorney has filed an appellate brief on his behalf. In the brief, counsel challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence to support Crawford’s conviction. We deny Crawford’s pro se motions.
On April 8, 2004, pursuant to this Court’s order, the trial court held a hearing regarding Crawford’s waiver of his right to counsel. Crawford and his court-appointed counsel…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- High v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Currie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by30 opinions
- Fewins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Sickles v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Alanda Suzanne Fewins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Alanda Suzanne Fewins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Barski, Christopher AnthonyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.