Legal Opinion

Sickles v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided September 14, 2005No. 10-04-00258-CRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

The order of this Court dated June 15, 2005 denying (1) Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw, (2) Appellant’s motion to file a pro se brief, and (3) Appellant’s motion for access to the appellate record is withdrawn. The following order is substituted therefor.

Appellant advised his appointed counsel that he desires to represent himself and asked counsel to withdraw. In our June 15 order, this Court observed that Appellant has no constitutional right to self-representation on appeal and cited two appellate courts which “have determined that there is no right for an appellant in a…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sowels v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  2. Cormier v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  3. Fewins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  4. Crawford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  5. Gonzalez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sickles v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  2. Bohannan, Michael WayneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Darryl Dewayne Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2014
  4. Hamis Athoman Chande v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2013
  5. Jeffrey C. Vaccaro v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API