Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 24, 2000No. 98-7809PublishedCited by 725 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

The Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of our Constitution guarantee that a person brought to trial in any state or federal court must be afforded the right to the assistance of counsel before he can be validly convicted and punished by imprisonment.1 In Faretta v. California, 422 U. S. 806 (1975), we decided that the defendant also “has a constitutional right to proceed without counsel when he voluntarily and intelligently elects to do so.” Id., at 807. Although that statement arguably embraces the entire judicial proceeding, we also phrased the question as whether a State may “constitutionally…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by725 opinions

  1. Kelley Mala v. Crown Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Pliler v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. CarruthersTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. United States v. Larry D. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

720 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API