Legal Opinion

Hays v. City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 2, 1953No. 16855PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

Plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, by writ of error, seek a reversal of a judgment of dismissal of their amended complaint, entered on motion of defendants in error, who were defendants below. Said complaint having been dismissed, plaintiffs elected not to plead further.

The record on error; submitted by plaintiffs, did not include their original complaint, defendants’ motion to dismiss the same, and the court’s ruling thereon. Defendants then applied to the trial court to have the original complaint included in the record, together with their motion to dismiss, and the ruling of the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. Shotkin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  3. Fairall v. FrisbeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clasby v. KlapperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Grand Lodge of Ancient & Accepted Masons v. Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. GREYHOUND RACING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN COLORADO, INC. v. Colorado Racing CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Simmons v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Janicek v. HinnenColorado Court of Appeals · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API