Legal Opinion

Shotkin v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 22, 1948No. 16,142PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

This inquiry has to do with the “Emergency Retail Sales Tax Act of 1933 [L. ’35, p. 1000, §1; L. ’37, p. 1075, §1],” 1947 Supp. ’35 C.S.A., c. 144. Based on section 27 of the amended act, respondent Perkins, Director of Revenue of the State of Colorado, has moved to dismiss the writ of error, for that, as said, the sales tax liability of petitioner within the contemplation of this proceeding, “has become final under the statutes of the State of Colorado.”

It appears that May 1, 1948, the Director of Revenue, proceeding in writing, issued a notice of administrative hearing on the sales tax…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Liebhardt v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  2. Palmer v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. Hays v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Sky Chefs v. City & County of Denver, Department of Revenue, Sales, Use, & Occupational Tax SectionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. Johnson v. City of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API