Palmer v. Perkins
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hays
On April 8, 1946, plaintiffs in error, to whom we herein refer as plaintiffs, entered into a contract with George H. and Bartle H. Day, for the purchase of the business known as New Method Laundry, including all tangible and intangible property connected therewith. This institution conducted a general laundry, cleaning and dyeing business in the city of Grand Junction. Pursuant to the contract the sale was consummated June 1, 1946, at which time a substantial sum was paid and arrangements made for the payment of the balance of the purchase price.
Upon learning of the above transaction…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bedford v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Tawes, Comptroller v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
- Fifteenth Street Investment Co. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Shotkin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
3Cited by13 opinions
- Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Washington National ArenaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Md.-Nat'l Cap. P. & P. v. Wash. Nat'l ArenaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- City & County Denver v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- V-1 Oil Company v. County of BannockIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Liebhardt v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.