Legal Opinion

Bell v. Hankins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1958No. 382PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.

The question posed for our consideration and determination is .simply this: Where a plaintiff institutes .an action to recover damages for the wrongful death of his intestate against persons alleged to be solely responsible for her injuries and death and thereafter the action is compromised by the entry of a consent judgment for a substantial sum, is said judgment a bar to the plaintiff’s right to maintain a subsequent action for the wrongful death of his intestate against a physician or surgeon for negligent treatment of the original injuries?

The right to maintain an action to recover…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Milks v. McIverNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Thompson v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Hinnant v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Ledford v. Valley River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Edmondson v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Simpson v. PlylerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. King v. Cape Fear Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Kendrick v. CainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Gilmore v. Fulton-DeKalb Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Galloway v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API