Legal Opinion

Hinnant v. Tidewater Power Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1925PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The defendant is a corporation operating an electric railroad between the city of Wilmington and Wrightsville Beach. On 25 August, 1920, the plaintiff’s husband was one of its employees, serving in the capacity of motorman, and at 6 :30, forenoon, in a collision of two of the defendant’s cars on the trestle between Wrightsville Station and Wrightsville Beach, he suffered personal injuries which resulted in his death at 3 o’clock the nextjmhning^ Thereafter his personal representative brought suit against the defendant and recovered a judgment for damages, which has been paid. C. S., 160,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. BrameSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Young v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Marri v. Stamford Street Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  4. Britt v. Carolina Northern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Nolin v. PearsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  5. Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API