Kirkpatrick v. Butler
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.
Whether plaintiffs, landowners on the edge of the Hassayampa River, presented sufficient evidence to go to the jury on the wrongful diversion of flood and surface waters by an upstream landowner, is the primary question in this appeal.
Plaintiffs-appellees, Ruth Butler and Edmond K. Butler, her husband, brought an action in the Superior Court of Maricopa County against defendants-appellants, M. B. Kirkpatrick and Mildred Kirkpatrick, his wife and Alaska General Credit Corporation, alleging that defendants wrongfully diverted surface waters into artificial channels,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ProebstelArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Schlecht v. SchielArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Parton v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1937
- Bravin v. Mayor of TombstoneArizona Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- Green Reservoir Flood Control District v. WillmothCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Espil Sheep Co. v. Black Bill & Doney Parks Water Users Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Campbell Estates, Inc. v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Campbell Estates, Inc. v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973