Espil Sheep Co. v. Black Bill & Doney Parks Water Users Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge.
The appellant, plaintiff below, filed an “Application for Temporary Restraining Order and for Permanent Injunction” to which appellee, defendant below, responded by motion to dismiss. As grounds therefor, the defendant contended that the trial court lacked jurisdiction and that the application failed to state a claim for relief.
The plaintiff filed its opposition to the motion to dismiss to which the defendant responded. Appended to defendant’s reply was a copy of a special use permit issued to it by the United States Forest Service with respect to constructing, operating and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roy Hunter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ProebstelArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Inyo Consol. Water Co. v. JessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Kalmanoff v. WeitzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Parker v. McIntyreArizona Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dube v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Fendler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Rutledge v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Arizona Public Service Co. v. LongArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Arizona Public Service Co. v. LongArizona Supreme Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.