Legal Opinion
In Re Simons
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 5, 2009No. 09-3109PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus under 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3) to enforce his rights as a crime victim under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (the “CVRA”), the Mandatory Victims’ Restitution Act, and the Constitution of the United States. The petition arises out of a criminal proceeding pending in the district court. The defendant in the underlying criminal action, the United States, and the district judge have responded to the petition. The petitioner moves for leave to file a reply memorandum in support of his petition. We permit the filing of the reply memorandum.
The district court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- W. Patrick Kenna v. United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- In Re DeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- In Re AntrobusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- In Re: Rory WalshCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Aguirre-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- In Re SimonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009