Legal Opinion
In Re Antrobus
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 14, 2008No. 08-4002PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This is an original proceeding in the nature of mandamus under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3). Sue and Ken Antrobus, the parents of Vanessa Quinn, request that Ms. Quinn be recognized as a victim of Mackenzie Glade Hunter’s crime of transferring a handgun to a juvenile in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(x)(1). Mr. Hunter is scheduled to be sentenced on Monday, January 14, 2008.
*1124I
On February 12, 2007, Sulejman Talovic murdered five people, including Ms. Quinn, and injured four others at the Trolley Square Shopping Center in Salt Lake City, Utah. One of the guns…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- W. Patrick Kenna v. United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Olson v. RatzelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Robinson v. Howard Bros. of Jackson, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- United States v. MonzelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Ford v. PryorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- In Re DeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Doyle ParolineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- New Mexico v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.