Legal Opinion
In Re Melendez
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 31, 1998No. 16-10685PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
HENRY J. BOROFF, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court for Determination is a Motion for Recusal (the “Recusal Motion”) filed by Sears, Roebuck and Company (“Sears”). The movant requests this Court’s recusal from ongoing hearings regarding reaffirmation agreements between each of the above-captioned debtors and Sears. Those hearings have been conducted pursuant to this Court’s orders to show cause why counsel for each such debtor did not violate Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9011 (“Rule 9011”) by signing the “declaration of attorney” which accompanied the respective…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Associates Commercial Corp. v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- BankBoston, N.A. v. Claflin (In Re Claflin)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2000
- In Re MinardiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
- In Re MelendezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- BankBoston, N.A. v. NantonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- In Re AdamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.