Legal Opinion
In Re Melendez
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 25, 1999No. 19-04005PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
HENRY J. BOROFF, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter is again before the Court pursuant to its orders to show cause why counsel for each debtor herein did not violate Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9011 (“Rule 9011”) by signing the “declaration of attorney” which accompanied the respective debtor’s reaffirmation agreement with Sears, Roebuck & Co. (“Sears”).
I. Background
Each of the foregoing debtors — Ana Melendez (“Melendez”), Linda S. Spenser (“Spenser”), Sheila LaFleur (“LaFleur”), Dana P. Callahan (“Callahan”), Robert J. Belisle (“Belisle”), Carla M. Crooks…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Whitehouse v. LaRocheCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Claudio v. LVNV Funding, LLC (In Re Claudio)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- In Re CollinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- In Re M.A.S. Realty Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- In Re VargasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.