Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Minardi

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 23, 2009No. 19-10374PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TERRENCE L. MICHAEL, Bankruptcy Judge.

Since the passage of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”) 1 a little over three years ago, the care and feeding of reaffirmation agreements has moved from the realm of simplicity to the kingdom of complexity. Many debtors’ counsel have attempted to wash their hands of the matter, leaving their clients (and, to a lesser degree, the courts) to fend for themselves. The issue before the Court today is whether counsel may exclude the negotiation of and/or advice concerning reaffirmation agreements…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Jamo v. Katahdin Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  4. In Re CastorenaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2001
  5. In Re DonaldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re GomesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2018
  2. In Re CollmarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
  3. In Re HarveyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010
  4. In re PittsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
  5. In Re BarronUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API