Legal Opinion

Smith v. First Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1959No. 4255PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to prohibit the respondent court and judge from trying him on a charge of first degree burglary. We agree with his contention that the act charged in the information is not within the statutory definition of the felony.

NRS 205.060 defines burglary as follows: “Every person who enters any house, room, apartment, tenement, shop, warehouse, store, mill, barn, stable, outhouse or other building, tent, vessel, vehicle, vehicle trailer, semitrailer or housetrailer, or railroad car, with intent to commit grand or petit larceny, or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Ex parte SMITHNevada Supreme Court · 1910
  3. People v. GibbonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State v. PetitWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. State v. DuranMontana Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jimenez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Anderson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. Zimmerman & SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. State v. RodriguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Application of LaioloNevada Supreme Court · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API