People v. Gibbons
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In this ease a hearing was granted after decision by the district court of appeal because of the earnest insistence of the attorney-general that the statute defining burglary in this state had been misconstrued. After á careful consideration of the authorities relied upon by petitioner, we are satisfied with the opinion of the district court of appeal, second district, heretofore filed herein and written by the Honorable Justice Craig and we adopt said opinion as the opinion of this court, as follows:
“The appellant, Venice Gibbons, and two codefendants, Tippen and Simpson, were…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. FrancoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. CoffeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. BuyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- People v. RavenscroftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Smith v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. Christopher J.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.