Legal Opinion

Springer v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1978No. 11958, 12240PublishedCited by 179 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

Appellants were convicted by a jury of conspiracy to commit first-degree murder and of solicitation to commit a felony, to wit: first-degree murder. On appeal they each claim: (1) that prejudicial error resulted from the procedures utilized by the trial court in admitting into evidence and (placing before the jury) tape recordings— and transcripts thereof — of conversations between Springer and Detective Bagley, an undercover Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) detective; and (2) that the trial court deprived them of their Sixth Amendment right to confrontation by unduly…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by179 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Roundtree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Toliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Mercer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API