Springer v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Chief Judge:
Appellants were convicted by a jury of conspiracy to commit first-degree murder and of solicitation to commit a felony, to wit: first-degree murder. On appeal they each claim: (1) that prejudicial error resulted from the procedures utilized by the trial court in admitting into evidence and (placing before the jury) tape recordings— and transcripts thereof — of conversations between Springer and Detective Bagley, an undercover Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) detective; and (2) that the trial court deprived them of their Sixth Amendment right to confrontation by unduly…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by179 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Roundtree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Toliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mercer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.