Legal Opinion

Eckert v. Eckert

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 4, 2008No. 17943, 17944PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The dispositive issue in the present appeal is whether a clause in a separation agreement that precludes modification of the amount or duration of alimony also bars modification of the definition of “gross yearly earned income,” as set forth in a separate section of the separation agreement. The plaintiff, Patricia Eckert, appeals 1 from the trial court’s denials of her two postdissolution motions seeking a modification of the definition of “gross yearly earned income” in the separation agreement between her and the defendant, David Eckert. In support of her claim, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Illuminating Co. v. Wisvest-Connecticut, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Amodio v. AmodioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Issler v. IsslerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Ahneman v. AhnemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Doe v. DoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Afkari-Ahmadi v. Fotovat-AhmadiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Isham v. IshamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Schimenti v. SchimentiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Nassra v. NassraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Schade v. SchadeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API