Legal Opinion

Schimenti v. Schimenti

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 24, 2018No. AC39175PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

In this postjudgment marital dissolution matter, the defendant, Matthew Schimenti, appeals from the trial court's orders requiring him to pay for one half of the initiation fee for a full membership into a country club for the plaintiff, Heather Schimenti, and certain of her counsel fees. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court's orders were improperly based on the trial judge's admitted bias and prejudice arising from her personal experience as a female golfer. He additionally claims that the court's order requiring him to pay the plaintiff's counsel fees constituted an abuse of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. People v. TyeIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Fagan v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Konover v. KolakowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Hudson City Savings Bank v. HellmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  3. Casablanca v. CasablancaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  5. Conroy v. IdlibiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API