STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Kyle Dean McCLAIN, Appellant

OPINION

CLEARY, Chief Judge.

The state charged appellant with first- and second-degree assault. Before trial, appellant moved to suppress a statement that he gave after a warrantless entry. The district court suppressed appellant’s statement,, but allowed it to be used for purposes of impeachment. During trial, the district court reversed the suppression order and admitted appellant’s statement as substantive evidence under the inevitable-discovery doctrine. The state subsequently utilized the statement for impeachment purposes and as substantive evidence. The jury convicted appellant and this…