Navarro v. Lamusga
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
In In re Marriage of Burgess (1996) 13 Cal.4th 25, 28-29 [51 Cal.Rptr.2d 444, 913 P.2d 473], we held that a parent seeking to relocate after dissolution of marriage is not required to establish that the move is “necessary” in order to be awarded physical custody of a minor child. Similarly, a parent who has been awarded physical custody of a child under an existing custody order also is not required to show that a proposed move is “necessary” and instead “ ‘has the right to change the residence of the child, subject to the power of the court to restrain a removal that would…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Lundquist v. ReusserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Washburn v. WashburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Burchard v. GarayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Marriage of LaMusgaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004