Legal Opinion

Griggs v. Meek

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1927No. 1333PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BrowN, District Judge.

This case comes to this court on direct appeal. Tbe parties therefore will remain as in tbe lower court.

Tbe defendant Percy Meek is a son of Otto Meek. Tbe defendant Western Investment Company is a Utah corporation, organized by defendant Otto Meek, May 29, 1919.

This is an action to set aside tbe contract of sale of tbe ranch, and tbe live stock thereon, consisting of horses, cattle, and tbe farm machinery used in connection therewith belonging to plaintiff, on tbe ground and for tbe reason that it was induced by tbe fraudulent representa tions of tbe defendant, Otto…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tarkington v. PurvisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Lipscomb v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State v. HazledahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Bader v. Mills & Baker Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Pratt v. Lincoln CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shafsky v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Baylies v. Vanden BoomWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Fryer v. CampbellWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Osborne v. District Court of Ninth Judicial DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Davison v. NicholsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API