Legal Opinion

Tarkington v. Purvis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1890No. 14,530PublishedCited by 38 opinions

From the Howard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The material facts in the present case, as *184found by the court, are that in the month of August, 1887, Joseph S. Tarkington exchanged his interest in the firm of T. H. Ellis & Co., dealers in hardware, of which firm he was a member, for certain real estate and $600 in cash, with Sanford B. Purvis, the latter assuming and agreeing to pay Tarkington’s share of the indebtedness of the firm. It is found that Tarkington, in order to induce Purvis to make the trade, made certain false representations concerning the value of the stock and assets of the firm and the amount of the partnership debts, to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Neblett v. MacFarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Gatling v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Higham v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. St. John v. HendricksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Montgomery v. PickeringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Deaton v. RushTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Citizens' National Bank v. JudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Green v. DuvergeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. RamseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API