Legal Opinion

Village of Chefornak v. Hooper Bay Construction Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1988No. S-2221PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

Chefornak, a municipal corporation, contracted with Hooper . Bay Construction Company for the removal of boulders from the river channels used by Chefornak residents. 1 For reasons that are not apparent from the record, a dispute developed between the parties, and, on October 22,1984, Hooper Bay filed suit for breach of the contract. In its answer, the city denied any breach and alleged that the project was incomplete.

Dale Curda, Chefornak’s attorney at the time, deposed several witnesses and subsequently advised the city to settle the lawsuit. The city contends that at…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. North Slope Borough v. Sohio Petroleum Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. O'Link v. O'LinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. DeKalb County v. Georgia Paperstock Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  4. Allen v. BussellAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Rochlin v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Christopher Burgos v. State of New Jersey (075736)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  4. Eric Forrer v. State of Alaska and Lucinda MahoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Carr-Gottstein Properties v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API