Allen v. Bussell

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RA-BINOWITZ, CONNOR, ERWIN and BURKE, JJ. RABINOWITZ, Justice.

This appeal is from the superior court’s denial of appellant Gale Allen’s motion to conform the superior court’s judgment to its findings. Allen’s attack on the superior court’s denial of his motion to conform is embodied in four separate specifications of error, all of which raise questions as to the construction and application of Civil Rule 60. We affirm the decision of the superi- or court.

The relevant facts are as follows. In April of 1966 Charles and Stellamae Bus-sell, appellees, commenced…