Legal Opinion
Strauss v. University of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 12, 1953PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.
Among the general and broadly diversified powers for the regulation of professions and professional practices granted by law to the Regents and the State Education Department is control over optometry. The Regents may1 4 supervise ’ ’ the entrance regulations and the practice of this profession (Education Law, § 211); the department shall have power to revoke an optometry license for 4 4 unprofessional conduct ’ ’ (§ 7108).
In the exercise of their authority over the practice of this profession the Regents made a rule in respect of advertising. They prescribed that it would be deemed 4 4…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rockland Light and Power Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Matter of Cherry v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Finlay Straus, Inc. v. University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tilcon New York, Inc. v. Town of PoughkeepsieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Kee v. BaberTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Wilson v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Civil Service Forum v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.