Legal Opinion

Pinho v. Atty Gen USA

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 20, 2005No. 04-3837PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FISHER, Circuit Judge.

In this case we are asked to decide when a vacated criminal conviction remains a “conviction,” and when it does not, for purposes of determining an immigrant’s eligibility for deportation. We conclude that the government may reasonably draw a distinction between convictions vacated for rehabilitative purposes and those vacated because of underlying defects in the criminal proceedings, and we establish a categorical test to guide this determination. Applying this test, we will reverse the judgment of the District Court.

I

A

Petitioner Gummersindo Pinho, a…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. Patel v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  2. Oyenike Alaka v. Attorney General of the United States Secretary of Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  3. Treasurer of New Jersey v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  4. Jose Cruz v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  5. Saleh v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API