Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Eureka Casualty Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 14, 1958No. Appeal, No. 365PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Watkins, J.,
The Eureka Casualty Company, the appellee, issued a “residence and outside theft” policy, which covered a diamond ring, to Stanley E. Gordon, the appellant. Mrs. Gordon while baking in their kitchen removed the ring and placed it in the pocket of her *638dress. ' She soiled the dress, removed it and sent it to the dry cleaner.
The same evening she remembered having put the ring in the pocket of the dress and remembered also that there was a hole in the pocket of the dress. She, Stanley, and their maid searched the floors of their home for the ring. She called the cleaner and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Caldwell v. St. Paul Mercury-Indemnity Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1950
- Miller v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Loop v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
- Deckler v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hammontree v. Central Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Lovas v. St. Paul Insurance CompaniesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Austin v. American Casualty CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Brier v. Mutual Insurance Co. of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1965
- Moss Theatres, Inc. v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.