Legal Opinion

Brier v. Mutual Insurance Co. of Hartford

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 18, 1965No. File No. CV 2-645-27810PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWise, J.

This is an action to recover on a homeowners’ policy for the loss of a wristwatch. The policy issued by the defendant to the plaintiffs was evidenced by a homeowners’ policy numbered H72-67-28 and was issued for the period from February 15, 1961, to February 15, 1964. The policy provided for coverage against theft from the premises and away from the premises. Under the designation “Perils Insured Against,” the loss by theft is included as follows: “Theft, meaning any act of stealing or attempt thereat . . . .” After the issuance of the original policy and on a date prior to April 30, 1963,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. St. Paul Mercury & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Caldwell v. St. Paul Mercury-Indemnity Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Conlin v. Dakota Fire Insurance CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Loop v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Levine v. Accident & Casualty InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Mancha v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Orenstein v. United Services Automobile Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. Sprau v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1970
  5. Heath v. Quincy Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API