Mier v. Southern California Ice Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This is an action to recover damages for the conversion by defendants of a crane and its equip ment. The complaint alleges that the crane was sold to plaintiff by defendants under an agreement to make delivery when requested. The case, which was tried before a jury, was submitted upon the evidence adduced by plaintiff, defendants having elected not to present any evidence. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, assessing his damages in the sum of $600. From a judgment on that verdict, defendants appeal, contending that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict in that there…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Swim v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Steele v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Courtis v. CaneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
- Green v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lusitanian-American Development Co. v. Seaboard Dairy Credit Corp.California Supreme Court · 1934
- McCafferty v. GilbankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Scott's Valley Fruit Exchange v. Growers Refrigeration Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Aronson v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Coy v. E. F. Hutton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.