Legal Opinion

In Re Correa

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1918No. Crim. No. 599PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District for discharge from custody under commitment upon an alleged insufficient complaint. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Habeas corpus. Jose Correa is in the custody of the sheriff of the county of Orange under a commitment issued out of the justice’s court of Anaheim Township, Orange County. In that court Correa was convicted of an alleged misdemeanor pursuant to a complaint which charged that the defendant at the time and place named did “willfully and unlawfully expose his person,” etc. It is admitted that by the complaint it was attempted to charge the offense described in section 311 of the Penal Code. That section, so far as applicable to this ease, is as follows: “Every person who willfully and…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Lusitanian-American Development Co. v. Seaboard Dairy Credit Corp.California Supreme Court · 1934
  3. People v. WepploAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1947
  4. Kuzirian v. MikkelsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. In Re CapannaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API