Legal Opinion

Basel v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1944No. Appeals, 173 and 174PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

These are companion suits in trespass brought by Mary Basel, widow of Joseph Basel, and administratrix of his estate, to recover for her own loss and the loss of ' the estate, resulting from negligence of the City of Pittsburgh, defendant, which is claimed to have been the sole cause of his death. The jury awarded her $3548.20 in the death action and $100.00 in the survival action. The learned court below in each case refused to grant the municipality’s motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial and from the entry of judgments on the verdicts, it appealed.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knox v. SimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Anstine v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Stark v. Fullerton Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Bernstein v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Bean v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Grutski v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Griffith v. WeinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Metro v. Long Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Di Gregorio v. Skinner, (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Weldon v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API