Legal Opinion

Metro v. Long Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1956No. Appeal, 116PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff recovered a verdict against the defendant, which the court below set aside and entered judgment for the defendant, n.o.v.

We affirm this judgment on excerpts from the opinion of Judge Kennedy as follows:

“On ruling on a motion for judgment n.o.v. we are required to view the testimony in the light most advantageous to the plaintiff and to resolve all conflicts therein in his favor and he is to be given every benefit of every fact and inference of fact pertaining to the issues involved which may reasonably be deduced from the evidence; and in addition the plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grutski v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Rich v. Petersen Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Griffith v. WeinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Notarianni v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Basel v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Enfield v. StoutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Gregorius v. Safeway Steel Scaffolds Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Unangst v. WhitehouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Spearing v. StarcherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Brown v. SchriverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API