Jones v. Luckel
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. Charles Wellborn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to quiet her title to a tract of land in Los Angeles County. On the trial, and preliminary to the introduction of any evidence, it was stipulated between the parties “that said plaintiff is the owner of the property described in the complaint . . . unless the title to said property has become vested in said defendant (Luckel) by virtue of the tax deed to be introduced in evidence by him and the deed to him by William P. Young which is to be introduced in evidence by him. ’ ’
Plaintiff rested her ease upon this stipulation, and defendant then offered in evidence a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Cty. Bank of San Luis Obispo v. JackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by7 opinions
- Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Bublitz v. ReevesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- DeFlon v. Van LueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Swann v. CarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Lathrop v. KelloggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.